Burgess, C., and Simpson, G. B. (1988). Neuropsychology of lexical ambiguity resolution. In Small, S. L., Cottrell, G. W., and Tanenhaus, M. K., editors, Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology & Artificial Intelligence, 411--430. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Caramazza, A., and Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3:572--582.

Cook, W. A. (1989). Case Grammar Theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14:179--211.

Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7:195--225.

Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E., and Harms, R. T., editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory, 0--88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Forster, K. I., and Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4:53--61.

Foss, D. J., and Cairns, H. S. (1970). Some effects of memory limitation upon sentence comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9:541--547.

Gibson, E. (1997). Syntactic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Manuscript.

Glucksberg, S., Kreutz, R. J., and Rho, S. (1986). Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for interactive models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12:323--335.

Hertz, J., Krogh, A., and Palmer, R. G. (1991). Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hinton, G. E., and Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98:74--95.

Hogaboam, T. W., and Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14:265--274.

Huang, M. S. (1983). A developmental study of children's comprehension of embedded sentences with and without semantic constraints. Journal of Psychology, 114:51--56.

Lange, T. E., and Dyer, M. G. (1989). High-level inferencing in a connectionist network. Connection Science, 1:181--217.

MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53:152--168.

MacWhinney, B. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29:95--141.

McClelland, J. L., and Kawamoto, A. H. (1986). Mechanisms of sentence processing: Assigning roles to constituents. In McClelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E., editors, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models, 272-325. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miikkulainen, R. (1990). A PDP architecture for processing sentences with relative clauses. In Karlgren, H., editor, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 201--206. Helsinki, Finland: Yliopistopaino.

Miikkulainen, R. (1993). Subsymbolic Natural Language Processing: An Integrated Model of Scripts, Lexicon, and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miikkulainen, R. (1996). Subsymbolic case-role analysis of sentences with embedded clauses. Cognitive Science, 20:47--73.

Miikkulainen, R., and Dyer, M. G. (1991). Natural language processing with modular neural networks and distributed lexicon. Cognitive Science, 15:343--399.

Miller, G. A., and Isard, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control, 7:292--303.

Onifer, W., and Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9:225--226.

Plaut, D. C. (1991). Connectionist Neuropsychology: The Breakdown and Recovery of Behavior in Lesioned Attractor Networks. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-185.

Pollack, J. B. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 46:77--105.

Schvaneveldt, R. W., Meyer, D. E., and Becker, C. A. (1976). Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Child Development, 48:612--616.

Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., and Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14:489--537.

Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleeremans, A., and McClelland, J. L. (1991). Graded state machines: The representation of temporal contingencies in simple recurrent networks. Machine Learning, 7:161--194.

Simpson, G. B., and Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11:28--39.

St. John, M. F. (1992). The story gestalt: A model of knowledge-intensive processes in text comprehension. Cognitive Science, 16:271--306.

St. John, M. F., and McClelland, J. L. (1990). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. Artificial Intelligence, 46:217--258.

Stolz, W. S. (1967). A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6:867--873.

Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18:427--440.