| HOME :: Journal List :: Article |
Full-text
| URL: http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/...risi2005HowCanWe.pdf |
Related links
| Authoritative: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540090500177539 (Publisher's PDF... likely be available here.) |
| Source: http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/Publications.html |
| Web search: Google Web Search :: Google Scholar |
| Within this site: Cited by (12) References (38) |
Abstract
In this paper, we explore various adaptive factors that can influence the emergence of a communication system that benefits the receiver of signals (the hearer) but not the emitter (the speaker). Using computer simulations of a population of interacting agents whose behaviour is determined by a neural network, we show that a stable communication system does not emerge in groups of unrelated individuals because of its altruistic character. None the less, another set of simulations shows that the emergence of a language that confers an advantage only to hearers, not to speakers, is possible under at least three conditions: (1) if the hearer and the speaker tend to share the same genes, as predicted by kin selection theory; (2) if the population is ‘docile’ and the communication system is culturally transmitted together with other adaptive behaviours, as predicted by Simon’s docility theory; and (3) if the linguistic system is used not only for social communication, but also for talking to oneself, in particular as an aid to memory.BibTexKeywords: Language evolution, Alturism, Neutral networks, Kin selection, Docility theory, Talking to oneself
@article{Mirolli05benefitsTheHearer,
author={Marco Mirolli and Domenico Parisi},
title={How can we explain the emergence of a language that benefits the hearer but not the speaker?},
journal={Connection Science},
year={2005},
month={December},
volume={17},
number={3-4},
pages={307-324},
doi={10.1080/09540090500177539},
url={http://groups.lis.illinois.edu/amag/langev/paper/Mirolli05benefitsTheHearer.html},
keywords={Language evolution, Alturism, Neutral networks, Kin selection, Docility theory, Talking to oneself}
}