| 2011 |
|---|
| [10] |
|
| Christiansen, M. H., Reali, F., and Chater, N. (2011) Biological adaptations for functional features of language in the face of cultural evolution. Human Biology, 83(2):247--259. |
| 2010 |
|---|
| [9] |
|
(6) | Reali, F. and Griffiths, T. L. (2010) Words as alleles: connecting language evolution with Bayesian learners to models of genetic drift. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1680):429--436. |
| 2009 |
|---|
| [8] |
|
(4) | Christiansen, M. H., Chater, N., and Reali, F. (2009) The biological and cultural foundations of language. Communicative \& Integrative Biology, 2(3):221--222. |
| [7] |
|
(23) | Chater, N., Reali, F., and Christiansen, M. (2009) Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. PNAS, 106(4):1015--1020. |
| [6] |
|
(10) | Reali, F. and Griffiths, T. L. (2009) The evolution of frequency distributions: relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111(3):17--28. |
| [5] |
|
(7) | Reali, F. and Christiansen, M. H. (2009) Sequential learning and the interaction between biological and linguistic adaptation in language evolution. Interaction Studies, 10(1):5--30. |
| [4] |
|
| Reali, F. and Christiansen, M. H. (2009) On the Necessity of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Language Universals. In M.H. Christiansen and C. Collins and S. Edelman, editors, Language Universals, pages 266--296. Oxford University Press. |
| [3] |
|
(10) | Reali, F. and Griffiths, T. L. (2009) The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111(3):317 -- 328. |
| 2007 |
|---|
| [2] |
|
| Reali, F. and Christiansen, M. H. (2007) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1):1--23. |
| 2006 |
|---|
| [1] |
|
| Christiansen, M. H., Reali, F., and Chater, N. (2006) The Baldwin effect works for functional, but not arbitrary, features of language. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Evolution of Language, pages 27--34. |